Nikon Coolpix P520 vs Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

April 8, 2013




Nikon P620 and Canon SX50 HS with beach landscape background

In this comparison I will help you decide whether to buy the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS or the Nikon Coolpix P520. Two excellent ultra-zoom digital cameras which uses the latest technology innovation from the two leaders of the digital photography world.

Overview

No doubt that super-zoom cameras are the most versatile ones among other zoom cameras due to their long optical zoom.  Whether you buy this camera for a trip or just as an all-purpose camera, super-zoom cameras will serve you very well. They allow you to get closer to your subject without actually getting close physically yourself.  These are great cameras for shooting at the zoo, capturing beautiful images of birds, shoot the big Ben’s clock up close    and much more.

Camera manufacturers utilizing latest technologies in order to improve the performance of those camera, making them perform faster and improve the image quality. It’s true that a camera that has less zoom might perform better than a camera with a much longer zoom, that’s due to the lens complexity. In this case both Canon and Nikon are also lens manufacturers with a lot of knowledge in building high quality lenses. They utilize their expertise in order to improve the optical characteristics of the from model to model.

The P520 and SX50 HS are probably the two most desirable  superzoom cameras on the market, and are also the flagship models for each company. In general, You can’t go wrong choosing either, but it’s worth paying attention to the finer details and make sure that you get the camera that is best for your specific needs.

So let’s begin our comparison with a short introduction to each camera and than we’ll talk about the differences in features and image quality. I hope that reading this article you will have a much better idea which camera you should get, SX50 HS or P520? — Let’s start!

 

 

Nikon Coolpix P520

The P520 replaces the Nikon P510 that was announced a year earlier.  It offers the same 41.7x (advertises as 42x, the number is rounded up) NIKOR optical zoom VR  lens as its predecessor, a 24-1000 mm lens. This lens offer great versatility as its offer a wide field of view(ie. for group shoots and landscape shots) as well as very large focal length to get those beautiful close up shot without the need to get physically closer to you subject.  Both the P510 and P520 look quite similar, Nikon did some cosmetic changes but overall the camera looks very similar to its predecessor.

The first noticeable change is the use of a fully-articulated LCD display compare to the tilted one on the P510.  The P520 display is also a 3.2-inch one, which is slightly larger than the P510 one.  This vari-angle display will help you shoot photos from above your head or below your knees, photos that you otherwise might miss with a fixed or tilt-only display.

Nikon P520 vari-angle lcd

Nikon P520 vari-angle Tilt/Swivel 3.2-inch LCD with the Electronic viewfinder on top of its

The Coolpix P520 utilizes a 18.1MP CMOS sensor, which provides plenty of details from the scene and gives you more room for cropping if you like to edit your photos in a photo editing software (ie. Adobe Photoshop Lightroom). It’s questionable whether digital cameras with a small sensor should use such high resolution, but will keep that to the image quality section — where you can understand whether or not this had any implications on the image quality. It’s worth mentioning that Nikon always works to improve the low-light performance of its sensors, but whether or not the P520 is a good low-light performer, you’ll know that later on this article.

The camera comes with an Electronic Viewfinder with 201K-dot LCD resolution. With Electronic viewfinders the image that you see is not coming though a mirror that the image is optically projected on, but instead utilizes a small (0.2-inch in the case of the P520) LCD display that projects the image as the sensor sees it. The EVF is of a low resolution, not advanced and impressive as you found on Compact System Cameras  though, which have even 2MP for the internal viewfinder’s LCD.

The Nikon COOLPIX P520 also features a built-in GPS which automatically geo-tag your photos, so you can sort, filter, search and display those photos in by their location. The data is embedded within the file itself so software that utilize this data can read it. It’s not visible on the photo itself, just a data that is embedded in the image file. The P520 is compatible with the WU-1a mobile adapter. This adapter allows you to automatically send your photos to your phone (ie. iPhone, Android phone), tablet (ie. iPad) or any compatible Wi-Fi enabled device. This makes it very easy to share photos by transfering them to your phone and utilize your phone’s Internet connectivity and apps to share those photos with friends and family.

Take a look at this Nikon P520 Wi-Fi demonstration, shows how easy it is to transfer an image from the camera to the phone.

P520 can also capture breathtaking 1080p Full HD videos with stereo sound. Super zoom cameras are best for this use, if only for there very long zoom range which allows you to be much more creative with your videos.  Nikon also utilizes its excellent Vibration Reduction mechanism (VR) in the lens so helps combating camera shake and help get a steadier shot for both images and videos.

The P520 also support full exposure manual controls (P/A/S/M), allowing you to take full control over the exposure and shoot the image exactly as you intended to. Of course the P520 can also put on full automatic mode for those who just want to point-and-shoot without the need to have any knowledge about exposure and stuff.

The P520 can shoot at amazing 7 frames per second in continuous shooting mode, allow you to grab a beautiful sequence of shots and make sure that you capture the moment as it happens.

The Nikon COOLPIX P520 is an amazing camera, that packs plenty of features that will allow you to capture beautiful photos that will impress your friends and family.

 

 

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

The SX50 HS replaced the SX40 HS which was and still is one of the most popular super zoom cameras on the market. The SX50 HS comes with a 24-1200 mm f/2.4-6.5 50x optical zoom lens — yes, you read it right, 1200 mm focal length. This is the World’s longest zoom lens ever created. The lens is slower (f/3.4-6.5 vs f/2.7-5.8) than than the SX40, and I assume that Canon has done it to keep the lens small due to the increment of the optical zoom. The SX40 HS is an excellent performer and was proven to be one of the best superzooms when it comes to image quality. Canon wants to repeat that history with this new model.

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS camera

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS superzoom camera

The Canon PowerShot SX50 HS has a 12.1MP sensor, same resolution as its predecessor. This is great, I can tell you that 12MP is more than enough, and the lesser pixels, the better the low-light sensitivity of the sensor and the better the image will get overall. the SX50 HS has a 1/2.3″ BSI-CMOS sensor, which is a small sensor. By putting more pixels onto this sensor Canon could hurt the image quality in some degree. One of the reasons people bought the SX40 HS was because of its high image quality, which was very impressive when comparing it to other superzooms on the market.

The SX50 HS comes with Canon’s DIGIC 5 image processor and allows you to shoot photos up to ISO 6400.  At the back you can find a 2.8-inch 461K-dots LCD, which lags behind the competition in terms of size and resolution. I don’t know why Canon hasn’t decided to go with a 3-inch and higher-resolution display, but my guess is that it wanted to keep the camera size small and the price relatively low — but again, I don’t the exact reason.

Canon works to make the SX50 HS an impressive camera when it comes to the lens performance. The SX50 lens will focus much faster than the SX40 HS, as much as 50% (0.38 sec vs 0.19 sec) improvement. The shooting time lag reduced by 44% as well from 0.45 sec. to 0.25 sec. The SX50 HS can shoot at 2.2 fps in P mode and up to 13 fps in High-Speed Burst HQ with a maximum continuous capture of 10 frames.

One of my favorite features is the Intelligent IS (image stabilization) feature — which allows to camera take full control of which image stabilization mechanism to use in order to result in a sharp image. The result is less blurry images in any condition.

Other features onclude Framing Assist Seek and Framing Assist lock to help you  keep track of your subject when using hand-held shooting with very long zoom. Here, take a look at the next video that demonstrates the Zoom Framing Assist capability.

The Sx50 HS also has RAW file format support — those enthusiast photographers among you will love this feature, which lacks on the P520. A RAW file stores the actual data from the sensor without any interpolation (ie. white balance, sharpness, saturation, etc.). This means that you can import your Raw file into a photo editing software and edit your image there and apply any interpolation using the software itself. This gives the photographer much greater control over the final image as well as being able to even extract more details from the image base on a more sophisticated Bayer interpolation algorithms that needs a much stronger computing processing power of home computers compare to the processing power of the camera.

The Canon PowerShot SX50 HS is an amazing camera that will be at the top of the list of many buyers.

 

SX50 HS vs P520 – Comparison

So there we have it, two ultra-zoom digital cameras — but the introduction doesn’t tell you about all the key features of the two camera nor it helps you understand the differences. The next spec comparison table will show you  the differences between the P520 and SX50 HS. It’s important that you read it and understand what each camera offers. I also write some side notes in the table to let you better understand what each on of the features means.

Nikon Coolpix P520Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
AnnouncedJanuary 29, 2013September 17, 2012The P520 is a newer camera
Sensor18.1 megapixels
1/2.3" BSI-CMOS
12.1 megapixels
1/2.3" BSI-CMOS
Both use the same sensor size with the SX50HS having lower resolution which we'll see in the next section whether or not this helps to get the SX50 HS an edge in the image quality / low-light test. BSI-CMOS sensors are twice more sensitive to light than CMOS sensors, and have better low-light capabilities -- allowing you to get better low-light images with less much noise
ISO80 - 320080 - 6400The SX50 HS support higher ISO sensitivity. 3200 vs 6400 means double the amount of light in favor of the SX50 HS -- although images at this ISO suffer greatly from noise (more in the image quality section)
RAWNoYesThe SX50 HS has support for RAW files, the P520 does not. RAW is the "digital negative" of digital cameras, it offers better control over the final image for those who want or need to get the best possible image quality and have better control over the image output workflow
Lens25-1000 mm f/3-5.9 (equivalent) NIKKOR Lens

41.7x (42x) optical zoom
Lens-shift Vibration Reduction (VR)



24-1200 mm f/3.4-6.5 (equivalent) Canon Lens

50x optical zoom
Lens-shift Image Stabilization (IS)
SX50 HS has a longer zoom, the world's longest zoom on the market. The P520 is a bit faster lens at the wide angle (more light can pass through the lens). Both Nikon and Canon use their fine high-grade optics and their well-regarded image stabilization mechanism to combat camera movement blur
LCD3.2-inch
921K-dots resolution

Vari-angle

(5-level brightness adjustment)
2.8-inch
461K-dots resolution

Vari-angle
SX50 HS LCD is smaller and has less resolution -- something that Canon needs to improve in next model. Considering the fact that many people shoot photos and recording videos using the LCD, this should be a a high-quality LCD in today's standards (which that what Nikon uses)
Shutter Speed8 - 1/4000 sec

(default 1 sec, 8 seconds whe shooting in ISO 80 or 100 in P, S,A or M Mode)
15 - 1/2000 secP520 offers faster maximum shutter speed, which is twice faster than the Canon's. Better for shooting fast moving subjects, and also when shooting in very bright day or when you want better control over your exposure by using faster shutter speed in Av or manual shooting mode.
Continuous ShootingUp to 7 frames per secondNormal: 2.2 fps (in P Mode)

Up to 13 fps in High-Speed Burst HQ (total of 10 frames in a row)
In order to take advantage of the 13 fps in the Canon you need to change to "High-speed burst HQ" in the menu (why an extra step?).
Video Max Resolution1080p30/25
1080i60

also includes Super slow motion movies at 640x480/120fps
1080p24

also includes Super Slow Motions movies at 640x480/120fps and 320x240/240 fps

* also available miniature effect (6fps, 3fps and 1.5 fps)
SX50 HS can shoot at 24p cinematic frame rate that many people love shooting with and it's also more video-editing friendly if you are doing professional work. Both cameras can shoot full HD videos and slow motion videos -- with the Canon offers a faster slowmo video at 240 fps as an option.
Storage TypeSD/SDHC/SDXCSD/SDHC/SDXCBoth cameras operate with SD cards
WirelessOptional using Wi-Fi adapterusing Eye-Fi cardThe two cameras support Wi-Fi connectivity for transferring images to your Wi-Fi enabled mobile device, the P520 using the WU-1a adapter, the Sx50 HS using the Eye-Fi card (both sold separately).
Battery (CIPA)200315SX50 HS has much better battery life, you can shoot more photos and videos on a single charge
Scene ModesBack Light,Beach,Black and White Copy,Close Up,Dusk/Dawn,Fireworks Show,Food,Landscape,Museum,Night Landscape,Night Portrait,Panorama,Party/Indoor,Pet Portrait,Portrait,Scene Auto Selector,Snow,Sports,Sunset,3D PhotographyPortrait, Smooth Skin, Smart Shutter, High-Speed Burst HQ, Handheld NightScene, Snow, Fireworks, Stitch Assist.

For videos: High Dynamic Range, Fish-eye Effect, Miniature Effect, Toy Camera Effect, Soft Focus, Monochrome, Super Vivid, Poster Effect, Color Accent, Color Swap
Dimensions125 x 84 x 102 mm (4.92 x 3.31 x 4.02″)123 x 87.3 x 106 mm (4.84 x 3.43 x 4.17″)
Weight550 g (1.21 lb / 19.40 oz)595 g (1.31 lb / 20.99 oz)The P520 weight 45g less
GPSYes, built-inNoThe P520 come with a GPS, the SX50 HS does not. Useful for those who using software and website to share, sort or view images based on location.
AFContrast Detect AF with 9 AF points
Contrast Detect AF with 9 AF pointsCanon reports a much improved AF performance over the SX40 HS, and also stated numbers that shows the improvement. , no such details from Nikon about the P520
FlashBuilt-in FlashBuilt-in Flash

+ hot-shoe for external flash
The P520 doesn't come with a hot-shoe connector, so you can't attach an external flash to it
ViewfinderElectronic

201K-dot
Electronic

202K-dot
No big difference here

As you can see from the above comparison table, there are a few differences between the two cameras that might lead you to pick one over the other. for example, the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS has support for RAW — this is an asked feature by enthusiast photographers who love editing photos using Adobe Photoshop Lightroom or other photo editing software. You don’t need to decide on the settings (ie. white balance, saturation, sharpness), in the field, just shoot and edit the image later without the need to know which pre-defined settings to use or whether the camera gets it wrong or not.

The Canon has a longer zoom lens. The differences between 1000 mm and 1200 mm is not big, but it gives that extra reach if you need it. The most important factor at this tele end is image quality. If image is soft at this focal length it won’t matter. For small prints and photos for the web it really doesn’t matter, but if you are more picky about how the image looks at the longest zoom, this should matter to you. The Canon SX50 HS has an amazing zoom and considering the size of the camera it’s really a big achievement – Kodus Canon!

It’s a shame that Canon didn’t use a larger and higher-resolution LCD, but I guess that they had a good reason for that. The thing is that shooting with the P520 via the LCD will be a better experience, even for viewing your photos and videos on the camera. This is something that should be improved in future models. Whether it’s a deal breaker, you will decide. If you want my opinion, it shouldn’t pose an issue at all. In most cases you just go outside and shoot and come back and look at the images on a large screen. It’s easier to compose your shots using a larger screen, especially if you love shooting videos. The bigger difference is that some people keep the camera away from their eyes in order to see both the scene with their own eyes and how it projects on the screen. With a larger display it’s easier to do because you get a better view of the projects image on the LCD when you view its a bit far away — due to the larger image size.

The Sx50 HS also has a better battery life, much better than the Nikon’s — which I think it’s a disappointment.  I personally don’t like to carry an extra battery, left alone it adds to the costs. It’s not a deal breaker, and that something that Nikon should improve in future models.

The Nikon P520 has a GPS, which is a great feature to have, especially when you take advantage of it. There are many applications that support the GPS metadata, including Facebook Apps and Google Maps. There are many software and online websites that allows you to sort, filter, search, view and share images based on the location that they were shot. Those also includes travel diary websites that keep track of you trip when you upload photos with embedded geo-location metadata.

I recommend going over the comparison table above, making sure that you understand the differences.

Now it’s time for inspecting the image quality!

 

 

Canon SX50 HS vs Nikon P520 – Image Quality

Disclaimer: I usually use dpreview and imaging resource comparometer to compare image quality, but both websites don’t have P520 sample images to compare against — so I went with a visual image quality analysis based on how I view those with my own eyes. Because I use a high quality Eizo monitor it make it easier to inspect the image and find flaws. Furthermore, image quality might vary based on the focal length and aperture used to take the photo.

Canon SX50 HS image quality analysis based on images on dpreview and other sources.

  1. Very sharp images with lots of details
  2. Very nice saturated colors
  3. Low amount of noise at low ISO up to ISO 200 (included)
  4. Image quality degradation starts at ISO 400
  5. Image is very usable even at ISO 1600! – there is noise of course, but for small prints and for the web it will look great
  6. ISO 3200/6400 too noisy in my opinion
  7. Very good control over chromatic aberrations
  8. At 1200mm, image a bit softer, but still goo performance overall

Canon SX50 HS 24mm vs 1200 mm sample images  (images via cameralabs flickr)

24mm

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS sample image
1200 mm
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS sample image
Image quality at 1200 mm is very good as you can see, even at 1200 mm!

 

Nikon P520 sample image analysis:

  1. Natural looking images with vivid colors
  2. Lots of details
  3. Images are on the soft side
  4. Good high ISO performance
  5. Paint like Noise pattern

Both cameras did an excellent job in Macro, but I personally favored the SX50 HS image quality, by quite a lot I have to see.  The Canon Sx50 HS image quality is really impressive. At 100% scale non of them will look perfect, you can easily find flaws when looking at 100% scale, especially when analyzing a camera with a small sensor.  But overall in terms of exposure, sharpness, colors reproduction and noise, I found the Canon sX50 HS to be a better camera of the two. For a super-zoom camera, the SX50 HS really impresses. Above ISO 800 both cameras deliver noisy images, and I recommend shooting below ISO 800 for the best image quality.
Video Samples

SX50 HS zoom test sample video

P520 zoom test sample video

You can see how useful the image stabilization is and how close you can get to a subject using the longest zoom in each camera. You can see that the zoom is just amazing, and how useful it is for travelers.

 

 

Conclusion

There we have it — two excellent superzoom cameras, each one with its cons and pros.  I was personally more impressed with the Canon SX50 HS’ image quality, but that doesn’t make the P520 less of a camera. I know that one of the biggest selling points for the Canon is its image quality. It was like that with the P510 and the SX40 HS and it continues to the next generation of superzooms. I think that this article provided some useful information for you in order to understand most of the differences between the two cameras, emphasizing of what’s should be important for the casual shooter who search to buy a new superzoom camera. I leave the decision to you, and I hope that after understanding the differences between the two, it will make it easier for you to make a decision.

I personally don’t take advantage of the GPS, don’t mind having a smaller LCD and I love the extra zoom of the SX50 HS, the RAW option, as well as its very good image quality. For me it’s more than enough, and If I had to chosoe I would probably went with the SX50 HS. Of course every person has its own specific needs, and you should understand what matter for you most and based your decision on that.

I hope that you find this comparison interesting and useful. If you did, please share it with your friends. Thanks guys and see you on the next article.

More Reviews and Articles

Related posts:

  1. Canon SX50 HS or Panasonic FZ200 – The Compromises
  2. Canon SX50 HS vs SX40 HS vs Nikon P510 Comparison
  3. Canon SX50 HS vs Panasonic FZ150 Comparison
  4. Nikon Coolpix L610 vs P510 Comparison
  5. Nikon Coolpix A Preview
  6. Nikon Coolpix P7700 Preview
  7. Panasonic FZ200 vs Canon SX50 HS Comparison
  8. Canon PowerShot G1 X vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 Comparison
  9. Canon PowerShot G15 vs G1 X Comparison – High End Compact Cameras

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

Billy Smith April 18, 2013 at 12:24 pm

Thanks for the detailed reviews you provide. I am hoping to see
a review on the new Fujifilm HS50EXR soon. I am back and forth
between it and the Canon SX50 and have a daugther”s graduation in
May to shoot. I know the HS50 has a 1/2 sensor and wonder if if
will provide better images. Thanks again.

Reply

Vipul May 25, 2013 at 5:45 pm

Thanks a ton for such a lucid review and made my job easy to decide the purchase. I am now owner of canon sx50hs and just loving it! I can’t believe the zoom capacity it offers!

-Vipul

Reply

PJ December 2, 2013 at 3:18 pm

One of the best, objectively written camera comparisons I’ve ever seen. Thank you so much. Because of you, I believe I can choose intelligently between these two cameras.

Reply

SB December 11, 2013 at 3:26 am

thak you for ur review and comparisons.
I will be buying CANON SX50HS.

Reply

Vitor December 18, 2013 at 5:46 pm

Thank you so much for this complete review. I was in great doubt about which one to buy, and after reading this review I decided going to Canon SX50. I went to a store today and tested both cameras. The only complaint about canon’s one is that I found it to noisy, all the time focusing and changing focus point when aiming at several objects. You can fell the vibration of the focus motor and together with the noise it’s quite annoying. But nothing is perfect, and the final point of my decision was made by this review.

Reply

Vibha December 23, 2013 at 5:05 pm

Thanks a lot for this detailed review. I own a Canon Powershot SX10, since 2009, and am in love with the camera. I have traveled with it and taken fabulous pictures and videos ( nature as well as objects and people ) in USA, New Zealand, Japan, Europe, Abu Dhabi, and have shot the dancing fountains from atop the Burj Khalifa – the world’s tallest building – in perfect detail – and that attests to the wonder that the little camera is. I looked at the SX50 because my sister wanted a similar one to mine, and came across this review. My question relates to noise in low light conditions with the SX50. Has there been any improvement in this feature over the SX10, because that is the only one little grouse I have had? Maybe I just continue to use it straight out of the box from day 1 (and never bothered to make any adjustments), but I have had some difficulty in getting sharp pictures in dim light. I would appreciate your input regarding the capabilities of the two cameras compared here regarding this issue. Thanks for you help ………..

Reply

LT January 5, 2014 at 1:51 pm

Thank’s for this great review! Better than the other Canon vs Nikon review sites i have been looking at. I spesially liked that you showed the option to use Nikon WU-1a Wireless Mobile Adapter and the Eye-Fi card, which i did not even know existed. Great!

Reply

Bandungman March 13, 2014 at 6:53 pm

Thanks for the review.
For me, Nikon P520′s most advantage is the cheaper price. But I will choose Canon SX50 HS because of the longer zoom, longer battery life & the hotshoe for external flashlight.

Reply

Leave a Comment